|
Posted By Clore Social Leadership,
27 July 2016
Updated: 14 October 2020
|
With the closing date for applications fast approaching (midday on Monday 5 September 2016), everyone at Clore Social Leadership is hugely excited to receive applications to our 2017 programme. However, we understand that the process can be a little daunting, so in addition to our FAQs and selection criteria, we have devised a few key points to help guide you through it.
1. Have the support of your employer/nominator
The support of your employer during the Fellowship process is paramount. Your employer needs to understand that the programme is not just an investment in your own leadership development, but an investment in the whole social sector.
Your employer will need to understand their own commitment, as well as the benefits that their organisation will gain from your Fellowship. The support of your employer will become a key element of your development as a leader over the 12 months. From providing you space to share your learnings with your organisation to assisting you with progress and impact surveys, we expect them to stay engaged throughout the Fellowship.
We expect your employer to be your nominator; they will normally be either your Chief Executive or your Chair. In exceptional cases it might be a senior leader in the social sector who knows you well. Make sure they are briefed thoroughly before applying.
More detailed information on the commitment and benefits to employers can be found in the Information for Employers section of our Prospectus.
2. Demonstrate how and why the Fellowship is right for you at this particular time
We want to see what your reasons are for applying to the 2017 Fellowship at this particular point in your life. Where are you on your leadership journey, and why would the Fellowship be right for you now? What do you hope the Fellowship help you achieve?
This will show us whether you have the vision and self-awareness, as well as readiness and head-space necessary to make the most of the opportunity that our 12-month programme will provide you with.
3. Clearly illustrate how you will give back to your organisation and the sector
Although we are strong believers that leadership development encompasses your individual journey, we also strongly hold that it is in fact much bigger than that. We see leadership development as an investment in the whole sector, a way of strengthening the social sector for the future. This is why giveback is one of the key aspects of the Fellowship.
We are therefore looking for applicants who have an appetite to bring back what they learn on the Fellowship to their organisations to achieve better outcomes for their beneficiaries and the community.
4. Show us your flaws
When completing application forms it can be easy to fall into the trap of only showing the best parts of yourself. However, we want to see what you can gain from the Fellowship, how it might help you, and whether you have the self-awareness to do it. Various elements of the programme will allow you to gain further insights into where your strengths lie, and what you could work on.
5. Come to a recruitment event
We are running a number of information events this summer to support you and your application. One of the best ways to get your questions answered, and get a feel for what the Fellowship entails in practice, is to come and talk to the Clore Social Leadership team and our Fellows at one of our events. See our Fellowship Events page for more information and registration details.
If you can’t attend any of our events and still have questions, please call us on 020 7812 3770.
Good luck with your applications!

Tags:
application
challenges
change
culture
event
future
journey
skills
team
tips
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Clore Social Leadership,
20 July 2016
Updated: 14 October 2020
|
Caroline Mason CBE is Chief Executive at the Esmée Fairbarin Foundation. The Foundation funds our gender equality Fellowship on our 2017 Fellowship programme.
At Esmée we talk a lot about the importance of key people. As one of the largest independent funders in the UK, we place our trust and our money in the hands of some of the most brilliant, entrepreneurial and effective leaders in the social sector.
We have also supported organisations where the actions, and sudden departures, of leaders have failed organisations and their beneficiaries. So you might want to know from me, what do I think an effective leader looks like?
I've seen great leaders who have spotted something they want to change, and built up organisations from scratch to make that change happen for the most disadvantaged people in our society. I've met brilliant people who have moved over from the private or public sector, determined to use what they’ve learned there to help the charitable sector avoid the same mistakes. I've worked with excellent people with a long history of working for non-profits, who have worked their way up and have a huge knowledge of what works in our sectors. And I've met inspirational leaders who have themselves experienced hardship or prejudice, and set out to change the lives of people like them.
All these leaders can be effective - they can make a difference for their beneficiaries, inspire their staff and impress trustees. But they can also make the same mistake - which is to hold too much of the power and influence, too much of what makes their organisation great, within themselves.
Leadership is not about complementing your own strengths and weaknesses, it's about building a team who can shape, deliver, and own a shared vision together. In this sector it is often tackling an issues that affect many people. If you left your organisation tomorrow, would it be able to excel and deliver without you?
The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation is a leading independent grant-making foundation in the UK who fund our gender equality Fellowship on our Fellowship programme. Rebecca Gill and Polly Trenow are our 2016 gender Fellows. Apply now to our 2017 Fellowship programme - the deadline is midday on Monday 5 September 2016.

Tags:
casestudy
challenges
change
skills
team
value
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Clore Social Leadership,
25 May 2016
Updated: 14 October 2020
|
Blog by Shoshana Boyd Gelfand, Director at JHub and speaker at Clore Social residential – May 2016
"She has issues with authority."
That’s what my second grade teacher told my parents after I led my classmates in a minor mutiny around lack of snack choices. My parents weren’t sure whether to be delighted at my leadership potential or terrified that I was going to get kicked out of primary school for challenging authority!
Many social activists experience similar issues around authority because creating social change fundamentally involves pushing up against the boundaries of established structures and ways of doing things. But that doesn’t mean authority is negative or evil. On the contrary, authority is a crucial force which leaders can mobilize for good.
There are even times when authority is exactly what is needed to solve a complex technical challenge. When an army needs to capture a position or when a surgeon needs to excise a cancer, it is wise to entrust the regiment or the operating room to a competent authority figure who has the know-how to fix the immediate problem. In situations which are not technical, however, authority will rarely be sufficient to produce the necessary change. So when a society needs to ask what issues are worth going to war over, or a person needs to stop smoking in order to preserve their health, something beyond an expert authority figure is needed. That something is leadership.
In his seminal work, Leading without Easy Answers, Ronald Heifetz defines leadership as "mobilizing people to do adaptive work." Unlike technical challenges, which require expertise and can be addressed with authority alone, adaptive work happens with new situations which challenge a group's established beliefs, attitudes and behaviours. Leading a group through an adaptive challenge requires engaging them in finding a way forward as opposed to telling them what to do. So while authority figures can often be successful at solving technical problems and maintaining stability, leaders doing adaptive work will need to use other tools - such as raising challenges constructively and creating healthy disequilibrium within a system. That disequilibrium is what provides the necessary momentum for people to examine and alter their values, attitudes and behaviours. It is dangerous work - and often the person exercising this kind of leadership will not be a person who holds formal authority. That’s because the pressure on authority figures to maintain the status quo is huge - so huge that they often cannot lead change effectively.
But that doesn't mean that authority should be demonized. On the contrary, the most effective results can arise from an alliance, often implicit, between those in authority positions (e.g. an elected official) and those leading without authority (e.g. a social activist). A clever authority figure will therefore use the disruption caused by an activist as a catalyst to help stakeholders examine their values and behaviours and create systemic change.
So don’t knock authority. It’s a necessary and useful tool in our leadership toolkit. Whether applied to a second grade snack time revolution or the Middle East crisis, we would benefit from creating alliances between those in positions of authority and activists who can serve as catalysts for social change.
For more on adaptive leadership, watch this video interview with Ronald Heifetz.

Tags:
authority
casestudy
fellow
skills
value
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Clore Social Leadership,
04 May 2016
Updated: 14 October 2020
|
Blog by Eve Poole, Know Yourself, Be Yourself, Look After Yourself facilitator and lecturer at Ashridge Business School.
Resilience as a core leadership skill is all the rage at the moment, probably because we're all running on empty, particularly in the social sector. When I facilitate workshops with Clore Social Leadership, I use a timeline exercise with the Fellows and short course participants. Using a piece of A3 paper, we draw our leadership career as a timeline, with highs and lows either side of a line across the page. Highs are personal bests, and lows are when we have really struggled. We usually focus it on strengths, necessary conditions, triggers, and career trends. But perhaps it is most powerfully a reminder of our extraordinary resilience. On the page, those lows invariably turn once again into highs, and the story behind this transformation is the one I want to focus on. What have you learned about your own patterns of resilience from how you have bounced back in the past? Are there ways you could cushion yourself better next time?
We all suffer from set-backs. The neuroscientists Kevin Ochsner at Columbia and James Gross at Stanford University have shown that teaching people to reframe stimuli, changes how they experience and react to them. You can train emotional regulation, first by controlling attention to emotionally evocative stimuli, then by cognitively changing their meaning. In the jargon, this is to force a switch from the cortical and subcortical emotion-generative systems to the prefrontal and cingulate control systems. What?! Maria Konnikova explains it this way:
(1) Change the situation to force perspective – if you can’t hang up, stand up; if you can’t walk away, suggest a walk with the person who has upset you. Call for a comfort break just to give yourself time to regroup. Distance yourself physically and in time if possible (‘go home and sleep on it’), but otherwise use mental distancing by hovering above yourself and watching the action through a camera lens. Imagine how an onlooker would describe the scene and ask yourself what you’ll think about this in hindsight.
(2) Reframe what has happened – force yourself to look for an upside, because this will in effect remove captaincy from your amygdala and return it to your rational brain. This will in turn start calming you down, and give you access to a wider range of options in how best to respond.
You can practice these skills by applying them around you whenever you notice that powerful emotions are kidnapping your colleagues. Rescue them by creating distance, then by reframing the situation for them: if Pollyanna was coaching you, what silver lining would she see in this situation? But remember, you've done this before, and you can do it again: you have already proved your resilience, and this too will pass.
If you are interested in our Know Yourself, Be Yourself, Look After Yourself workshop run by Eve Poole on the 25 October, please email info@cloresocialleadership.org.uk or call 020 7812 3770.

This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Clore Social Leadership,
12 April 2016
Updated: 09 October 2020
|
Blog by Emily Sun: Catalysing and Leading Change short course facilitator and HR specialist.
I’m certainly not the first to write that the UK’s social sector is facing significant and disruptive challenges: decreases in public funding sources, increased pressure to deliver measurable outcomes and results, and an unprecedented knock in the public’s trust in the sector as a whole. The demands on leaders within the sector are greater than ever, and the ability to lead change effectively is becoming an increasingly critical skill.
Here are three things to consider when leading change:
1) 'Yesterday I was clever and tried to change the world; today I am wise and am changing myself.' - Rumi, 13th century Persian poet.
We often focus a great deal of our energies on the processes, systems or tasks that need to be changed, and not enough on the attitudes, values and mind-sets that underlie these behaviours that need to adapt to the new context. Before we can even begin to influence others’ attitudes and behaviours, we need to start with an understanding and awareness of our own conduct to understand how it might affect the change we would like to see happen. This is where honest introspection and some candid feedback from those who know us well can be invaluable.
2) Solve problems by focusing on what’s going well.
It’s human nature to zero-in on problems and all the things we feel aren’t right or good enough. An approach called Appreciative Inquiry developed by David Cooperrider of Case Western Reserve University, encourages us to look for success stories within our own teams and organisations. It is based on a powerful assumption that building on strengths brings better results and is much more motivating than focusing too much on weaknesses and failures.
3) 'People do not resist change; people resist being changed.' – Richard Beckhard, organisational change pioneer.
We often think that if a necessary change makes a lot of sense to us, that all other rational beings will also clearly understand the need and benefits of the change we’d like to make. Leaders can underestimate the degree to which we react to change through our emotions, rather than our rational, logical selves. No matter how beneficial a change may be to the future of an organisation, if we perceive it as having a negative impact on our status, sense of control, certainty or fairness, we aren’t going to warm to it very quickly. This doesn’t mean of course that we shouldn’t go ahead with the change; it’s just that if we want to bring the rest of the organisation with us in this change, we will need to be very mindful of the impact it will have on people affected and how best to engage them positively.
In light of these considerations, those working in the social sector who deal with organisational change may want to further develop their skills by attending the short course I am delivering for Clore Social Leadership.
Find out more by visiting here and call 020 7812 3770 to book.

Tags:
challenges
change
values
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|