This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Skills and Development
Blog Home All Blogs

How can leaders and managers prevent the collapse of charities?

Posted By Clore Social Leadership, 23 October 2017
Updated: 23 October 2020
Don Macdonald, a trainer, trustee and former charity CEO, is writing a series of New to Management blogs for us. His new book, Twenty First Century Skills for Nonprofit Managers, published by BEP, is available to buy now.

As charity leaders and managers, we have all received rejection letters or emails from funding agencies or trusts, some of which in turn threatened the future of our organisations. The first duty of a charity is to survive, and according to management consultant Peter Drucker, management is obviously instrumental in leading the organisation through difficult times and ensuring survival.

There are recent lessons from the private sector about this. Provident Financial radically changed its business model, switching over sales staff and customers to Internet use, and changing from local part-time staff to full-timers. Debts rose and profits fell drastically because traditional customers were averse to this approach. The shares crashed out of the FTSE 100 and the CEO had to leave.

Why do charities collapse?

There are numerous reasons why charities collapse or close down, some of which overlap.

  • The need which they were set up to overcome no longer exists, or never really existed in the first place;
  • The need still exists but the funding disappears e.g. training charities after the introduction of the UK Work Programme;
  • The business model is all wrong;
  • Malpractice or mismanagement.


One of the most destructive cases is when a founding CEO directs the organisation on the wrong track. An example was Novas Scarman, founded in 1998 as a care and homeless charity, which crashed from a 2008 turnover of £21 million to closure in 2012, with redundancy for 300 staff.

However this also happens to long-established organisations. The English YWCA, set up in 1855, has virtually disappeared, yet the YW pioneered really interesting youth work in the 1950/60s, including outreach work with young women and men. The YW also provided 4,000 beds for young woman, centrally managed in 1996. After this, the YW was hit with a huge demand to install essential fire precautions in its hostels; it had not saved sufficient funds for these, so they sold all their hostels and carried on with youth work, rebranding as Platform 51 in 2010. Two years later, as Civil Society reported, ‘Platform 51’s spending ... (had) outstripped its income by more than £1m each year since 2008.’ So in 2014, it transferred its remaining youth work to another charity and became a small research and lobbying organisation.

Yet if you take the right action at the right time, it is possible to rescue an organisation from severe deficits. The UK Outward Bound Trust had a deficit of £3 million on a turnover of £8/9 million in the 1990s and was ‘close to insolvency’ according to its current director. It was turned round by an interim CEO, who had run the Duke of Edinburgh Awards, through a process of restructuring and offering shorter courses.

Do’s and Don’ts

So what should a manager or leader do to prevent such issues?

  • Show leadership, be resilient, don’t panic and seek help and advice;
  • Always keep on top of the finances;
  • Think long-term, stay well-informed to predict trends, and produce a realistic work plan which should be regularly updated to look ahead for at least three years;
  • Do not put all your eggs in one funding basket - diversify so that if one fund winds up, you have other options;
  • Do keep evolving, but change a winning formula gradually - not so radically that success is destroyed;
  • Carry out a regular risk analysis and save for emergencies.

Please share your views and comments below, or join the conversation on Twitter.

Tags:  funding  management  skills  tips 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

How do you manage evaluation properly?

Posted By Clore Social Leadership, 30 August 2017
Updated: 23 October 2020
Don Macdonald, a trainer, trustee and former charity CEO, is writing a series of New to Management blogs for us in anticipation of his new book, Twenty First Century Skills for Non Profit Managers, being published by BEP in November.

Impact evaluation is now essential in our sector, with increasing numbers of funders requiring evaluation results and systems as part of their bidding process. If you manage a small charity where you are responsible for organising evaluation yourself or commissioning a consultant, you must put effective systems into place. Even if you have not studied social policy, it is still possible to organise something worthwhile.

To evaluate properly you need to know your targets and objectives. Of course, with some contracts from statutory agencies, targets are defined for you. With trust funders, you may be asked to define your own targets, therefore any that you propose must be both realistic, so that you can achieve them, and challenging, so that the trust will approve them (more about target-setting in an upcoming blog).

You must then make sure you have the right systems in place for collecting data on your participants, activities and results (See below). Unless your organisation is tiny, you will almost certainly need a computer programme to record and analyse any data collected, either a spread sheet or a Customer Relationship Manager (CRM) database and there are even some free ones available.

If you have collected it properly in the first place, this data can always be evaluated in more depth at a later time. Make sure you get participants’ agreement to collect data and follow any other legal requirements, as new ones arrive with GDPR. Don’t collect irrelevant data, and any data collected must be measurable and objective, using phrases such as ‘distance travelled’ is too woolly. You need to measure:

  • Numbers and profile of users (ethnic origin, gender, age, residence, background regarding service provided e.g. employment status for job-finding projects)
  • Inputs, against targets, namely actual services provided to different clients (e.g. reaching the right client group, courses and support provided)
  • Outputs against targets (e.g. starting work, qualifications)
  • Outcomes against targets (e.g. staying in work, changes in behaviour)
  • Feedback and self-assessment from clients and stakeholders and partner agencies

 

Another way to ensure that monitoring and evaluation are soundly based is to use a framework known as the Theory of Change (TOC). Developed by the Aspen Institute, it defines long-term goals such as the actual changes that are desired, and works backwards to identify critical success factors that are necessary to achieve the long-term goal. The table below shows a TOC mapping exercise, outlining the various outcomes, outputs and activities necessary to achieve long-term outputs.


Theory of Change showing the mapping of a reduction in offending project


Activities

Action planning, information & advice, one-to-one counselling, positive change course & skills training for 100 offenders & ex-offenders from one region

Inputs

Programme attended by 90% of participants for 75% of sessions

Outputs

75% of participants complete positive change course & also achieve a skills qualification

Outcomes at end of programme

75% of completers progress into work, further education or self-employment, with a reduction in reported offending

Long-term wider impact

Lower levels of offending, greater levels of employment, better health and well-being in the community

 

It is important that staff, volunteers and beneficiaries are consulted in development of evaluation systems to bring a wide range of ideas crucial for the success of the project. If you can organise a thorough evaluation, it is also useful for publicising your organisation’s work and effectiveness.


Please share your comments about this blog below, or join the conversation on Twitter.

Tags:  charitysector  evaluation  funding  future  management  tips 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Leadership: Holding boundaries

Posted By Clore Social Leadership, 06 March 2017
Updated: 22 October 2020
Julia Worthington MinstF(Dip) is a Fundraising Leadership Coach and Mentor based in the north of England. Find out more about her here.

Here’s a quick quiz question. It’s Friday night, and you’re just putting your coat on when your boss comes in, and asks you to stay late to finish a report. You’ve made plans to go out for dinner with your family. How do you respond? Do you sigh, and take your coat off again – after all, the report must be important and your family are sure to understand? Or do you politely but firmly say that you have other plans for tonight, but you’re happy to come in a little early on Monday?

If you’d always choose to stay and do the extra work, your response might not be as helpful as you think it is, nor does it demonstrate great leadership. Setting clear boundaries at work helps to make you more productive, and saying ‘yes’ to everything isn’t always the best response.

Some of the leaders I work with say ‘yes’ to working at an evening event when they have a night class or circuit training, or they say ‘yes’ to completing reports or extra work on their own because nobody else volunteers. Whilst this can be a successful short term solution, it is not effective over months and years.

While constant demands on your attention and focus might make you feel in demand and successful, they can also drain your focus, positivity and productivity, leaving you feeling like you’re not in control of your own life.

If you continue to be the person who says ‘yes’ all the time, no-one will appreciate your sacrifices as they’ll think you genuinely don’t mind being permanently on call– and they’ll keep asking you.

Each time someone makes a request, think about it based on individual merits. Is it a genuine, unavoidable emergency where it’s all hands to the pump, or could it be rescheduled? Is someone else better placed to deal with it, can you delegate it?

How can you avoid always agreeing? Instead of automatically saying ‘yes’ to every request, say you’ll check your diary and get back to them. This will not only give you a little thinking time, but will also help break the reflex ‘yes’ habit.

For conditioned people pleasers, saying ‘no’ (or even ‘not yet’) can be difficult. Safeguarding your personal time is essential to achieving a good work/life balance, and makes you more productive during the times you are at work. Setting boundaries really will help you to be a better leader, and surprisingly the sky doesn’t fall in.

Tags:  authority  change  efficient  funding  skills  team  tips 

PermalinkComments (0)